Michael Jackson, The Little Prince And The Long Shadow Of The Pisces Moon

Share this post

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit
VK
Tumblr
StumbleUpon
Telegram
Pocket
WhatsApp
Email
Robert Phoenix

Robert Phoenix

journalist, blogger, interviewer, astrologer & psychic medium

lil_michael“The infant boy struggles against his father’s hands, fighting the narcissistic father’s desire to bind or murder him; and he struggles against the swaddling bands, fighting the narcissistic mother’s desire to change him into what she wants. When the boy fails to get free…he learns to sulk… he becomes passive to his own hurts….” Robert Bly

So it’s been a while since I posted (a week is a long time for me). I’ve been dealing with filtering lots of info and trying to get a sense with what’s appropriate for the site and of course there’s plenty to talk about regarding the passing of Michael Jackson (Virgo) and I wanted to give the subject and Michael’s passing a few days before commenting on him and what might be the meta-meaning, especially as it relates to astrology. I think enough time has passed to look at Jackson’s passing from many angles. So let’s shoot the rapids down the rabbit hole and see where we go.

On an archetypal level. one could easily predict that Michael was not long for this world. Whether it was a health or wealth issue, Jackson was living on borrowed time.

One of the most meaningful books I read in my early twenties was written by one of Carl Jung’s proteges, Marie Louise Von Franz. Von Franz started off as an assistant for Jung and eventually became a Jungian therapist and an important one in her own right. The book she wrote was “Puer Ateernus” which loosely translates into, “Eternal Youth.” In “Puer Aterenus” Von Franz uses two examples of prolonged adolescence in literature, the main and most important one being “The Little Prince” by Antoine De Saint Exupery. In it, she weaves the story of “The Little Prince” with that of Exupery’s own life and case studies of men who, in essence, refuse to grow up. Exupery was a pilot and spent a lot of time flying (not grounded) away from his wife and her mother, whom Exupery considered oppressive and meddling. In this flight from terrestrial responsibility, Von Franz saw a man who was not willing to confront the challenge of channeling his masculinity and dealing with the rigors of responsibility. She makes allusion after allusion that “The Little Prince” is in actuality Exupery himself and that their fates were intertwined.

Von Franz rejected the idea that Exupery was an artist, she claimed that he was not someone committed to the psychic rigors of being a dedicated and successful artist. She felt that Exupery at best was an auteur and at worst a dilletante, who simply played at being an artist, much in the same way a child would.

In many regards, this completely fits Michael Jackson’s profile, everything from “Moonwalking” (not on Earth) to Capt. Eo, to Neverland (Peter Pan) he occupied the same flighty atmospheres as Exupery and his Little Prince. Michael was a puer incarnate. He avoided real intimacy much like Exupery, even though he had children (well sort of). While I don’t want to disrespect the life of Michael, I’m not sure that he was a great artist. He didn’t play anything, didn’t really write much of his own material and was not heralded as a producer (that honor would go to Quincy Jones, Jackson’s opposite, with Sun in Pisces). He was a performer, like the man whom he is most often compared to, Elvis Presley (Capricorn). He was one of the best, but he was not an artist along the same lines as say Prince (more on him later). In essence, Jackson fit the profile of the puer to a tee and his inability to ground himself in relationships and intimacy would doom him to the gravitational pull of the spirit realm, flight out of the body, escaping from the chains of this mortal coil.

Getting a fix on Jackson’s chart is not easy. Astrotheme has him as a Libra Rising, which would place his Moon, in Pisces, in his fifth house. Ellie at Crystalinks has Jackson’s Moon in the 10th house, so getting a fix on Michael’s stars is nearly as difficult as getting a fix on this plane. I’m okay with the Astrotheme chart as it has Cancer on Jackson’s mid-heaven, which makes his 10th house, Leo and also makes total sense to me. There, in the 10th house, we find Uranus, Venus and Pallas, all projecting out into the world. Venus in Leo sextiled Jackson’s ascendant. The love and adoration that he experienced on the world’s stage, moved in a graceful flow towards Michael’s projected self and then back again. The Venus/Leo circuitry creates a charismatic loop that fueled Michael’s love from his fans and vice versa. it was a love affair that was tested often throughout Jackson’s turbulent career. Uranus conjuncting his Venus in the 10th House illustrates the sudden and dramatic turns in his relationship with the public, with startling moments like Martin Bashir’s revealing and at time startling interview, the child abuse/molestation cases/trials, etc. Shcoking details and events would be par for the course with Jackson throughout his life. Chiron in Aqurius in the fourth house speaks to Michael’s shy and retiring nature, opposite Leo and his house of fame (Thanks Gloria!). It also speaks of a wounding of perhaps being exposed to mass media at a young age.

Jackson wrestled with fame and was hurt when he showed too much and starved when he got too little of it. But perhaps Michael’s most telling planet on so many levels, was his Moon in Pisces.

Jackson’s Moon in Pisces was in his 5th house, the house of children, creativity, romance and the father. In Michael’s 5th house the relationship with Papa Joe is obscured by the Moon opposing Michael’s Sun. All is not what it seems. Not only does it oppose his natal Sun, but also his natal Pluto. This is more than powerful–it’s positively polarizing. What do we know about Jackson’s relationship with his father and what don’t we know?

It has long been established that Michael had been abused by his father. Michael himself had openly stated it. But to what extent? One of the the theories that’s floating around deep, alternative, news sites, is that Papa Joe had had Michael castrated after the age of ten, so that Michael could keep his falsetto voice. Go back to the beginning of this piece and the whole concept of “The Puer” as exhibited by Exupery and “The Little Prince.” If there’s any truth to this terrible possibility, it would lend credence as to why Michael never grew up and felt more comfortable around children, since he would have been emotionally sealed off at the age ten when he would have been castrated. In essence, he would have been emotionally frozen in time. Factor in the opposition of The Sun and Pluto with his Moon, the darkness of the moon in house five, in Pisces, where all is not what it seems. But that isn’t exclusive to Michael’s life, but also extends into his death as well. Controversy surrounding his children, who they will live with, even the actual paternity of those children will also come into question. Then there’s the meta-level.

While Michael died, titanic legislation was passed by congress as the world was stunned and mourning for Jackson. “The Clean Air And Security Act” a 1200 page bill that hardly anyone in congress had read was passed. While CNN and Fox devoured every single morsel of Jackson’s demise, this bill sailed by, mostly in anonymity. While there’s layer upon layer of rules and bylaws in the bill, the bottom line is that people are going to be systemically taxed, everything from turning on their computers, to driving to work in order to fund this bill. Not only that, but it dramatically changes the economic and energy landscape in this country. One of the industries most affected by this is the coal industry, yet another of the last American industries that is being truncated and erased, thus taking more jobs and money out of the pockets of American workers. Say what you will about automobiles and coal, they’re still two of the few industries that produce something in The USA. That means less jobs and dollars, yet again.

Some people might look favorably upon these events, but try telling that to a family in MIchigan or West Virginia, whose futures are considerably less clear than they have ever been before February. The party line is that sacrifices are going to need to be made and that these are the hard choices that are going to be “forced” upon the American people and that they have little choice in the matter.

Whether it was the stimulus bill, the government takeover of GM and now this bill, the current administration is quickly morphing into something resembling a deathstar, obliterating almost anything in it’s path in order to achieve it’s goal of establishing itself as the dominant force in politics and business, a corporacratic monolith that swells in power with each passing week.

Meanwhile, the public downloads Jackson MP3s (Sony thanks you) and waxes nostalgically, not just for the life of Michael, but for the innocence of the times that he represents. Those days with his passing, are officially over.

Tomorrow, is Mike Tyson’s birthday and we’ll have a look at him as wel as yet another glance at the life and death of Michael Jackson.

Editor’s Note. This is breaking and heart breaking news, yet it relates to the Pisces Moon in The 5th House: Jordan Chandler reveals that he lied to dig into Jackson’s fortune.

7 thoughts on “Michael Jackson, The Little Prince And The Long Shadow Of The Pisces Moon”

  1. R

    Okay, Robert, this is weird. I just opened my aol email, and there was an “aol search” box, illustrated with a graphic of The Little Prince.

  2. a

    Renee, damn, I hate it when those guys swing by my website and steal my best ideas.

    Gloria, your vision is crystal clear on many levels :-). Duly noted and updated. Those French websites make those asteroids hard to read!

  3. T

    I hoped you’d write about MJ, Robert. I wasn’t disappointed in your take – as usual you go deeper and wider – and better – than most.

    I was nodding along all the way to the last para or so. You know why! 😉 The house passing that Bill didn’t elude me, and I heaved a sigh of relief that at last somebody is doing something on this front. It still has to pass the Senate though, doesn’t it?

    When I arrived on these shores almost 5 years ago I was horrified at the way nobody – nobody was caring about the environment and climate change. Al Gore gave me hope after a couple of years, but still progress was so painfully slow. I bought a flagpole and flew the Earth flag for 4 and a half of the 5 years, the only thing I felt I could do to draw the attention of passers by who wondered what on earth this dopey Brit was doing. I took it down when Obama became Prez because I fel that this was a turning point. At last, they had woken up! And yes, there will be need to sacrifice. Would you rather sacrifice a little now or a lot – maybe everything – later, or in the lifetime of your son? They haven’t done enough – but they have tried to do something!

    Sorry to rant on what is really MJ piece, Robert – and an excellent one. RIP Michael.

  4. A

    Hi Robert,

    I know it is difficult to expect families in W.V. to do something different to support their families. I don’t live too far from W.V. but I can say that plenty of families have been raped by the coal companies and don’t have clean water! Real change is never easy. My mom has a saying, “If you know change is coming make the change. If you choose not to it will be made for you and you won’t like it”.
    I am with Twilight….you’re not dopey.

  5. a

    I have to say that I am indeed deeply concerned about my son’s future but I am not sure that climate change and C02 emissions are really the issue that I am passionate about, but I frame reality just slightly differently, for better or worse.

    First off, Al Gore was merely a figurehead for a movement. it was his bone for laying down so nicely after the 2000 election and letting The Bush crime family and their cronies begin their systematic plundering of not only our economy, but our reputation abroad. it was Al’s big payback.

    The science of global warming is highly in dispute. Over 100 scientists have come out in the past week opposed to Obama’s claim that the science around global warming is 100% irrefutable. These are not people driven by a political agenda, but science and they ply their trades at Princeton, MIT, Cal Tech and other well regarded institutions. While we are banging the drum for a phenomenon that is highly debatable, each day since 1998, planes have been criss-crossong the skies and dumping barium, aluminum, and other goodies into the atmosphere with the result that people are getting sick and sicker everyday. Beyond the future, I am deeply concerned about the present, watching the effects of the spraying impact me and others, including my son. I once had a brief one-on-one moment with Dennis Kucinich and we talked about chemtrails and he admitted to me that “they are real and they’re making people sick.”

    So if I have to put my energy around something that’s real, here and now, versus a debatable fact of science and the future, I think I know where my instincts and concern lie.

    My big piece around the current administration, whether it’s the bailout, the stim pack, this bill, the upcoming clean waters bill, etc is that they are using these events and opportunities to grab more power and grow the government into a corporatocracy, which is essentially a fusion of socialism and capitalism, with an emphasis on the social part. I know this is where you and I diverge Twilight.

    As far as forcing change upon people goes and the painful side effects of it, do you think that the upper 5% are going to feel the pain? Feel the change? Do you think that their livliehood is in any way, shape or form going to be impacted by what’s comning at us in a negative way? Nope. They’re still going to experience the same benefits that their oligarchic caste affords them, while those below them suffer and scramble to make ends meet, make meaning of a world that is raidly changing and being determined for them, no matter whethter they agree to it or not.

    My, personal solution is to re-build the infrastructure in the country, nit with green jobs, but local businesses, local production of goods, services and innovation. To develop pockets of the private sector where innovation is rewarded and communities can support one another from a ground up level, but this approach is counter to the vector of the current administration, which is all about top down in every regard.

    Socialistic capitalism is just another layer of control, which allows the elite to concentate more and more power at the top and make a seamless transition to a government that looks after and safeguards “their” best interests, which is the accumulation of power and wealth on a global scale, to the exclusion of others.

    They’re playing Monopoly and guess who’s winning?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to Top